Editor’s Note: Ohio Senator Rob Portman is a key member of the Senate committee that considers postal legislation. ONA members are urged to contact the senator’s office. The e-mail contact form is here; the mailing address is Senator Rob Portman, 448 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510. ONA has a sample letter, courtesy of the NNA, available for your use in the “members only” area of our website.
From the NNA
The National Newspaper Association, America’s alliance of community weekly and daily newspapers, this week continues a multi-front attack against unfair postage rate increases with litigation at the Postal Regulatory Commission and strong grassroots work on Capitol Hill.
NNA has joined the Affordable Mail Alliance at the PRC to object to the planned “exigency” postage increase proposed for January. NNA and others are arguing that the U.S. Postal Service has overstated the amount of its financial losses created by the Great Recession.
On Capitol Hill, NNA opposes proposals by Sen. Tom Coburn, R-OK, to hand over authority to USPS—to set rates and to change service levels without—pre-review by the Postal Regulatory Commission. Coburn’s proposals are included in a the Postal Reform Act of 2013, jointly proposed by Coburn and Sen. Thomas Carper, D-DE, chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. NNA believes handing unfettered authority over the government monopoly’s services and rates to the USPS Board of Governors would result in higher rates for Periodicals and more attempts at promoting selected direct mail products over newspaper advertising.
“NNA has an obligation to the industry and our communities to help cure the ills of the Postal Service in ways that do not dilute service or drive more mailers out of the system. Both of those results would end up in a massive taxpayer bailout of the Postal Service in the future because mail volume will fall off even more sharply than it is today,” said NNA President Robert M. Williams, Jr. “We understand that new legislation is needed and that we will not always get what we want. But we have our sights trained on solutions that do not further diminish service, particularly in rural America. And we need a fair playing field for newspapers.
“I have asked members of NNA’s Congressional Action Team, operating under the expert leadership of our chair, Deb McCaslin, of Nebraska, to call their senators on the Homeland Security committee, which will be writing the legislation,” he said. “We need to keep the PRC in a proper regulatory role and continue to work for laws that create meaningful cost controls for the Postal Service.
“Our board in September reaffirmed our partnership with the Affordable Mail Alliance as well. We are working in a very strong coalition to litigate at the PRC on the proposed rates.”
Max Heath, NNA’s Postal Committee chair, has produced estimates on the impact of the proposed postal rates for newspapers. As always, the average proposed rate hits some newspapers harder than others.
“We believe some rates will fall in the 8 percent to 9 percent range,” Heath said. “I have cautioned our members that these rates are proposed and not final. The PRC still has to speak. I believe we have a strong case to reduce this proposed increase and would hope we wind up with something closer to the legal increase within the rate of inflation.”
McCaslin noted support for NNA’s position from Sen. Susan Collins, R-ME, one of the authors of the 2006 Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act, where the inflation-based price cap was created. Collins has written the PRC that Congress never intended for the legal “exigency” or emergency rate authority to be used as USPS proposes.
Collins said she believed the exigency power was to be used “sparingly … only if terrorist attacks, natural disasters and other events cause significant and substantial declines in mail volume.” She said the PRC’s approval of the higher rates could be inconsistent with the law.